Bürgergeld Loan Denied: What You Can Do Now

Your fridge has broken down, the washing machine is out of order, or the landlord demands a deposit - and the Jobcenter denies your loan application. The reasoning sounds harsh: "That is included in the standard need." Or: "You could have saved up." In many cases this is open to legal challenge. Here you can read when a loan (Darlehen) under § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II is owed and how to proceed against the rejection.

The Most Important Points in 30 Seconds

  • A loan (Darlehen) under § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II is granted for an indispensable need (unabweisbarer Bedarf) that cannot be covered from the standard need - for example a broken fridge or stove.
  • Typical wrong reason given by the Jobcenter: "included in the standard need". This only holds if the need really could have been saved up for.
  • Repayment: 10 percent of the standard need is withheld monthly directly from the Bürgergeld (§ 42a SGB II) - currently around 56 EUR for single persons.
  • A grant (Beihilfe) (non-repayable) is only available in special cases under § 24 Abs. 3 SGB II, e.g. for initial furnishing or orthopaedic shoes.
  • Objection deadline: one month from receipt of the notice (§ 84 SGG). In acute hardship, additionally an urgent application to the social court.

We review your decision within 5 minutes. Free and non-binding.

Why Does This Happen?

The standard need (2025: 563 EUR for single persons) is meant to include small reserves for replacement purchases. From this the Jobcenter often jumps to the conclusion: "You should have saved up, so no loan." This is precisely where the legal dispute lies. The law distinguishes between needs that are typically savable (clothing, shoes, a new kettle) and those that occur so suddenly or are so large that they cannot realistically be financed from the standard need.

Example: Frau Demir, single parent with two children, has been receiving Bürgergeld for 18 months. Her fridge stops working on Saturday morning - repair is no longer worthwhile, a new appliance costs 380 EUR. She has 62 EUR in her account. On Monday she files a loan application with the Jobcenter. Two weeks later comes the rejection: "The need is to be met from the standard need, saving up would have been possible." With two children, ongoing electricity and phone bills and no assets, there was nothing to save. The rejection is open to challenge.

Common rejection reasons at a glance:

  • "The need is included in the standard need."
  • "Saving up would have been reasonable."
  • "The need is not indispensable - you can wash clothes in a launderette."
  • "Friends or food banks / Caritas can provide it."
  • "A used appliance for under 100 EUR would have sufficed."

Each of these reasons may be correct in an individual case - or not. The decisive point: the Jobcenter must check indispensability concretely, not reject on a blanket basis.

Your Rights in Concrete Terms

1. Legal basis § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II. For a need that is covered by the standard need but is indispensable in the individual case, the Jobcenter provides the benefit as a loan (Darlehen). Requirement: the need is indispensable (no postponement possible) and not otherwise covered (no assets, no reasonable saving possibility).

2. Loan vs. grant distinction. A loan (Darlehen) is repayable and applies during ongoing receipt of the standard need. A grant (Beihilfe) (subsidy, non-repayable) is only available under § 24 Abs. 3 SGB II for certain special cases - initial furnishing of the home, initial provision of clothing, purchase and repair of orthopaedic shoes, therapeutic devices. Anyone who needs a fridge as a replacement purchase therefore receives no grant, but at most a loan - unless it is a genuine initial furnishing situation.

3. Indispensability is checked individually. Indispensable means: the need must be temporally and substantively compelling. A broken fridge in summer with a small child in the household is indispensable. A second sofa in the living room is not. The social courts demand an individual case review by the Jobcenter, not a template.

4. Deposit, rent arrears and housing protection (§ 22 Abs. 6 and Abs. 8 SGB II). For the rental deposit, the Jobcenter can grant a loan (§ 22 Abs. 6 SGB II). For taking over rent arrears to prevent homelessness, § 22 Abs. 8 SGB II applies - again typically as a loan. If the Jobcenter rejects despite an imminent eviction action, this is particularly critical: urgent legal protection often applies here.

5. Repayment under § 42a SGB II. A granted loan is paid back through monthly offsetting with 10 percent of the relevant standard need - at 563 EUR standard need this is around 56.30 EUR per month directly from the Bürgergeld. The offsetting is legally permitted, even if it is noticeable. Important: it must be expressly ordered in the loan notice.

6. Right of objection (§ 84 SGG). You can file a free objection against the rejection notice within one month. Informal but in writing. A two-line note to keep the deadline is enough; you can submit the reasoning later.

7. Urgent legal protection (§ 86b SGG). In acute hardship - the fridge has been off for days, food is spoiling, the deposit must be paid within a week - you can file an urgent application with the social court. The procedure is free, informal, and often decided within one to three weeks.

Current Case Law

The Bundessozialgericht has repeatedly clarified that rejecting a loan with a blanket reference to "saving up" is not enough. The Jobcenter must check in the individual case whether saving was actually possible and reasonable - taking into account the concrete financial situation of the entitled person. [URTEIL-REFERENZ]

It is also established that a fridge or washing machine belongs to the basic equipment of a household and can constitute an indispensable need on failure - particularly in households with children or sick persons. The reference to a launderette is not reasonable on a blanket basis. [URTEIL-REFERENZ]

On the loan/grant distinction, the courts have repeatedly emphasised: the list in § 24 Abs. 3 SGB II (grant as non-repayable subsidy) is to be read narrowly. What is not listed there can only come into consideration as a loan under § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II. Nevertheless, the grant provision must not be undermined by wrongly relabelling an initial furnishing situation as a replacement purchase. [URTEIL-REFERENZ]

What To Do Now

Step 1 - Secure deadlines. From receipt of the rejection notice, the one-month deadline runs. Note the date of receipt (keep the envelope!) and put the last day of the deadline in your calendar.

Step 2 - Read the notice carefully. What exactly does the Jobcenter hold against you: "included in the standard need", "saving possible" or "not indispensable"? The reasoning determines the angle of your objection.

Step 3 - Document the situation. Photo of the broken appliance, repair quote or purchase receipt of an inexpensive replacement appliance. For a deposit: rental agreement and the landlord's request. For rent arrears: reminders or eviction action.

Step 4 - Disclose the financial situation. Account statements for the last three to six months. Show: no reserve was possible, ongoing obligations, no buffer. This is the most important argument against "saving was possible".

Step 5 - File the objection. Brief and informal: "I hereby file an objection against the notice of [date], file number [number]. Reasons to follow within four weeks." In writing, signed, by recorded delivery or in person with a date stamp.

Step 6 - Submit the reasoning. Refute every rejection ground individually. Refer to § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II, to indispensability and to the missing individual case review by the Jobcenter.

Step 7 - Urgent application in acute hardship. If you cannot wait for the objection decision (empty fridge, eviction action looming), file an urgent application with the social court for interim legal protection under § 86b SGG in parallel. Free, fast, effective.

Typical Mistakes To Avoid

  • Buying immediately and billing later. If you buy the appliance before approval, the Jobcenter often sticks to its rejection. A retrospective cost reimbursement is legally difficult. Exception: a demonstrable acute emergency.

  • Objecting only orally on the phone. Does not count. The objection must be made in writing or recorded for the file at the Jobcenter. A phone call does not save the deadline.

  • Not checking the entitlement to a grant. Anyone who wrongly accepts a loan for initial furnishing after a separation, after release from prison or after a fire pays back 10 percent monthly - although a grant under § 24 Abs. 3 SGB II would have been possible. Always check the grant first.

  • Accepting 10 percent repayment even if it is unreasonable. In particular hardship cases, the level of repayment can be challenged. If the offsetting pushes your standard need below the existential minimum, a review is worthwhile.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an "indispensable need" within the meaning of § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II?

Indispensable means: the need cannot be temporally or substantively postponed and cannot be covered otherwise. A broken fridge, a broken stove, a washing machine in a multi-person household with children - those are typical examples. Glasses can also be indispensable if without them no capacity for work remains. A decorative piece of furniture or a second TV, on the other hand, is not.

Do I get a grant or only a loan for a broken washing machine?

As a rule only a loan (Darlehen) under § 24 Abs. 1 SGB II - replacement purchases are not initial furnishing. A grant (Beihilfe) (subsidy) under § 24 Abs. 3 SGB II for the washing machine is only available if it is part of a genuine initial furnishing (first own home, after separation, after fire, release from prison, flight). Anyone who has been receiving Bürgergeld for years and merely needs a replacement gets at most a loan.

Do I have to accept a used appliance?

Not on a blanket basis. The Jobcenter may meet the need economically - often via a used or low-cost new appliance. But: the appliance must be functional, energy-efficient (running electricity costs!) and suitable for the size of your household. An ancient fridge with high power consumption is not reasonable if low-cost new appliances are available at a similar price.

How high is the loan repayment rate?

Under § 42a SGB II, 10 percent of the relevant standard need is withheld monthly directly from the Bürgergeld - at 563 EUR standard need in 2025 this is 56.30 EUR per month. For a 500 EUR loan the repayment therefore runs for just under nine months. Repayment regularly starts from the month following approval.

The Jobcenter has rejected my loan for the deposit - what now?

For the rental deposit, there is regularly a loan claim under § 22 Abs. 6 SGB II if the move is necessary or arranged by the Jobcenter. The frequent rejection "not necessary" is often open to challenge - for instance when moving from inappropriate housing or in case of housing emergency. File an objection and, if the move-in date is acute, also an urgent application with the social court in parallel.

Have Your Notice Reviewed Now

A rejected loan application is in many cases poorly reasoned - missing individual case review, blanket reference to saving, wrong distinction between loan and grant. The one-month deadline is short, and in acute hardship every day counts. You do not have to fight your way through § 24 SGB II alone.

We review your decision within 5 minutes. Free and non-binding.

Have decision reviewed